🔗 Share this article

Iran is ready to restart atomic discussions with the United States provided that it is handled with "dignity" and "respect", Tehran's top diplomat has announced.

Abbas Araghchi stated exclusively dialogue was effective, and shared recent overtures had come from intermediaries to resume negotiations with the US government. He asserted Iran did not have secret atomic facilities, and Iran was not yet able to permit the global atomic watchdog to visit attacked atomic facilities for protective measures.

Navigating a Challenging Path

The foreign minister is navigating a difficult path since Iran wishes not to be perceived to be operating from a stance of vulnerability, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had emerged more resilient militarily and psychologically from the joint assault on its nuclear sites in June.

He was addressing at a defense forum in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to refine atomic fuel within its borders that it will always maintain" – the key factor of the impasse in the prior discussions.

Previous Negotiations Abruptly Ended

The prior phases of talks between the United States and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and bitter end on 12 June when Israel, with American backing, targeted Tehran's atomic facilities in a two-week conflict that concluded with the US president asserting the facilities had been eliminated. Subsequently, EU nations employed their authority to restore UN-wide sanctions, but Iran insists they have not had a substantial consequence.

Magic Solution Offered

Iranian officials said they felt they had attained a "ideal resolution" to the uranium processing matter in prior discussions, when it was decided an Iran-based consortium with American involvement could refine atomic fuel. The two nations would have been able to declare success since domestic enrichment would have persisted and the US could be confident that Iran's nuclear programme was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been settled in the talks that American atomic experts could operate inside Iran, but that was a natural consequence of the cooperative offer. Officials asserted repeatedly they had achieved a deal with Washington's diplomat Steve Witkoff only for the deal to collapse due to "detractors in America".

Present Status

Iran's diplomats said the partnership proposal was now withdrawn, but it seems quite possible the suggestion could be resurrected in certain ways if talks reopen.

The US president in recent days stated he had been receiving messages that Iran wanted to restart talks, but privately Iran's diplomats claim they are not yet receiving coherent offers from America either directly or from key regional mediators, such as Qatar, Egypt, Oman and Saudi Arabia. The Iranian foreign ministry has been charged of inactivity in the face of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Iran says negotiations is not part of a show.

Diplomatic Standpoint

In his speech to the gathering, aimed to paint the US as a controlling nation that abuses the notion of worldwide standards, Araghchi declared the fortnight-long engagement showed the conflict could not be settled by military means. He stated the strikes began with a US demand for an unconditional Iranian surrender and ended with an unconditional call for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is certain the first strikes by Israel were executed with total Washington understanding and coordination, making trust challenging to reestablish.

Diplomacy Stays the Primary Resolution

Araghchi declared: "It was not Iran that had abandoned negotiations; it was the United States and the Western nations that had repeatedly attempted to enforce their will during the negotiations. Diplomacy can still be alive and remains the primary resolution to address disputes, but its standards, regulations and tenets must be respected."

"Provided that they talk to the Iranian people with the approach of dignity and respect, they will obtain a reply in the equivalent language."

Restoration and Reconstruction

In what is characterized by Iran's diplomats as the conflict of recovery and reconstruction, Araghchi said he was confident Iran's defence capabilities "are considerably enhanced than before 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been reestablished. We acquired multiple understandings from this engagement; we have discovered our own weaknesses and the weaknesses of the adversary."

He stated: "We successfully passed this engagement. Our atomic expertise, which they planned to obliterate, stays intact. The facilities and machinery, if destroyed, will be rebuilt; what is crucial is the will of the citizens of Tehran and then the social solidarity that they sought to undermine, but were unable to shatter. The nation of Iran have grown more resilient, more integrated, and more endorsing of the leadership and the state in the face of this attack."