🔗 Share this article

Australia's controversial action to prohibit social networking access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate internationally. Officials, child protection groups, and families are monitoring intently to see if this approach will become a template for other nations.

The European Trend

Throughout Europe, a rising group of nations are exploring similar measures.

• The Danish government has announced a prohibition on social media for under-15s, with the PM stating that phones and networks are "robbing our children's childhood". Legislation is expected to be enacted soon.
• Norway is set to implement a access barrier of 15, citing the need to shield children from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• Ireland is developing a online verification tool to authenticate the identity and age of social media participants. Authorities have stated that an similar ban is "one of the options under consideration".
• In Spain, the president has asked the legislature to enact a proposal lifting the minimum age for accessing social media to 16.
• In The French government, the president has proposed a ban for under-15s, and a legislative committee has recommended a comparable step, alongside an overnight "internet blackout" for adolescents.
• The government in The Netherlands has urged families to prevent their children from social media until 15.

Across the European Union, the bloc's legislature has approved a non-binding statement calling for a ban for under-16s without guardian approval is provided. Although it highlights of the "compulsive" nature of these platforms, the step does not create binding law.

"A clear age limit is a good foundation," said the parliamentarian supporting the initiative.

Britain: A Watchful Stance

In the UK, the leadership has kept open a future ban, arguing that "nothing is being dismissed" but stressing any decision must be "based on strong evidence".

Previously, support grew behind a bill to introduce limits on social media use by teenagers, but it was in the end weakened. Nonetheless, the administration committed to investigate the issue.

Charities have voiced apprehensions. One foundation established by the relatives of a girl who took her own life after being exposed to harmful online content argues that a strict age ban might not improve online safety and could create a "sudden drop-off" of exposure when teens reach the legal age.

"Australia's ban is a answer to the inability of the Silicon Valley to build tools that are secure and age appropriate for young users," said a prominent child protection advocate.

The United States: A Decentralized Picture

In the United States, action is largely happening at the local level against a backdrop of federal inaction.

• The state of Utah requires guardian permission for those under 18 to use social media and restricts late-night use.
• Florida has signed a law banning under-14s from joining social media, though it faces court battles.
• Virginia has approved a regulation capping minors to one hour of social media access per day, with extra access dependent on a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise passed measures demanding parental consent for under-16s to set up social media accounts.

Even with widespread concern and calls from certain individuals to mimic this lead, a US-wide ban is currently seen as unlikely.

Worldwide Perspectives

Outside of Europe and the US, other countries are also exploring options.

• The Malaysian government aims to ban social media for under-16s starting from next year.
• Brazil has raised the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

However, world agencies strike a more nuanced position. A major UN agency has advised that age-based restrictions pose dangers and "could backfire". The body highlights that the internet can be a "critical link" for isolated youth and that regulation should not be a "replacement" for tech companies to prioritize child safeguards.

Even as this international discussion unfolds, the policies of Australia and its followers show that states around the world are increasingly prepared to wait for tech companies to self-regulate.